Erica Rivera

writer, editor, artist đŸłïžâ€âš§ïž

In 2016, I had the great honor and privilege of being part of a university course dedicated to analyzing the history of Palestine through the lens of settler colonialism. Below follows a list of texts we were assigned to read for the course, sorted roughly by time period, as they were provided by the course facilitator. Combined, these texts form one of many excellent starting points for learning more about the history of Palestine, the experiences of Palestinians, and the infrastructures of settler colonialism. Wherever possible, I've linked to downloadable PDFs of the referenced texts. If you'd like assistance finding others, please e-mail me at [Work AT RiveraErica DOT com].

Read for Refaat

Between January 15 and 21, 2024, I participated in Read for Refaat, a day of action that kicked off a week of solidarity events focused on reading Refaat Alareer's work out loud and in public. You can listen to my recordings of selections from the texts on this page at the link above.

Read in Solidarity

On April 27 and 28, 2024, I also recorded myself reading from another list of texts relating to Palestine, including excerpts from the essay collection From the River to the Sea: Essays for a Free Palestine, as well as many of the texts that are available for free on Verso Books's “In Solidarity with the Students” page. You can download those texts on Verso's website or at the link above, and you can listen to those recordings at the link above as well.



Understanding Settler Colonialism


Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native

by Patrick Wolfe  Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native by Patrick Wolfe (152 KB)


Introduction – The Settler Colonial Situation

excerpted from Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview by Lorenzo Veracini  PDF download below

Download PDF of the introduction to Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview by Lorenzo Veracini (303 KB)


1882 – 1947


Chapter 7 – Purchase by Other Means: Dispossessing the Natives in Palestine

excerpted from Traces of History: Elementary Structures of Race by Patrick Wolfe  Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of Traces of History by Patrick Wolfe (4 MB)


Introduction and Chapter 1 – Zionist Transfer Ideas and Proposals, 1882-1938

excerpted from Expulsion of the Palestinians: The Concept of “Transfer” in Zionist Political Thought, 1882-1948 by Nur Masalha  Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of Part 1 of Introduction and Chapter 1 – Nur Masalha – Expulsion of the Palestinians – The Concept of Transfer in Zionist Political Thought, 1882-1948 (3 MB)

Download PDF of Part 2 of Introduction and Chapter 1 – Nur Masalha – Expulsion of the Palestinians – The Concept of Transfer in Zionist Political Thought, 1882-1948 (3 MB)


1948 – 1966


Chapters 4-8 from The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

by ï»żï»żIlan Pappe  Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappe (3 MB)


Zionist Colonialism in Palestine

by Fayez Sayegh  Alternative PDF downloads below

Download PDF of Zionist Colonialism in Palestine by Fayez Sayegh Part 1 of 3 (4 MB)

Download PDF of Zionist Colonialism in Palestine by Fayez Sayegh Part 2 of 3 (5 MB)

Download PDF of Zionist Colonialism in Palestine by Fayez Sayegh Part 3 of 3 (3 MB)


1993 – 2000


“The Morning After”

by ï»żEdward Said  PDF download below

Download PDF of The Morning After by Edward Said | London Review of Books (70 KB)


The Political Economy of Israeli Occupation: What is Colonial about It?

by ï»żLeila Farsakh  Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of The Political Economy of Israeli Occupation by Leila Farsakh (305 KB)


2000 – 2006


Hollow Land: Israel's Architecture of Occupation

by Eyal Weizman  Available via the Internet Archive


Palestine Inside Out: An Everyday Occupation

by Saree Makdisi  Available via the Internet Archive


2007 – present


“The Gaza Bombshell”

by David Rose  PDF downloads below

Download PDF of Part 1 of The Gaza Bombshell | Vanity Fair | April 2008 | David Rose (4 MB)

Download PDF of Part 2 of The Gaza Bombshell | Vanity Fair | April 2008 | David Rose (4 MB)


Chapter 5 – Class and State in the West Bank: Neoliberalism Under Occupation

Excerpted from Lineages of Revolt: Issues of contemporary capitalism in the Middle East by Adam Hanieh  Available via the Internet Archive Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of Chapter 5 of Lineages of Revolt by Adam Hanieh (586 KB)


Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict

Also known as the Goldstone Report (2009)  Available via the Internet Archive Alternative PDF download below

Download PDF of Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (3 MB)


This is How We Fought in Gaza: Soldiers' testimonies and photographs from Operation “Protective Edge”

Produced by Breaking the Silence

content/trigger warnings: brief, oblique references to suicide, suicidal ideation, murder, imperialism, gun violence, gore, blood, cults, classism, imperialism, and war






























This brief essay should examine an aspect of craft in a poem, story, or novel.






if you nominate me for a pushcart i will [REDACTED]



an unpaid volunteer survived

us Oligarchs our entertainments, our celebrities, our presidents our wars. yesterday we were

the Prize, small and honored. quell this. authors are no joy.






if you nominate me for a hugo i will [REDACTED]



Hug a prestigious World which is also responsible for

Property profit society and work — no defending it

Hug

  1. up to five people

  2. a ballot

  3. The end sometime

  4. A con and a special trophy.

We inform the Hugs.






if you nominate me for a nebula i will [REDACTED]



Science Fiction has a fantasy.

This notion grew into an

outstanding life for no more than one writer

And added Drama known as

the industry.






if you nominate me for a PEN anything i will [REDACTED]



America stands at the intersection of the United States and power. Our mission is to defend

ideas who carry out America’s mission

research policy festivals events awards fellowships and more.

America, ahead AWash a sin.






if you nominate me for a Best American anything i will [REDACTED]



The Best American is the finest guest in the field. This system is kind.






if you nominate me for an emmy i will [REDACTED]



cell

us

symbols of competition.






if you nominate me for a tony i will [REDACTED]



America

had success as woman, dancing to the stage. one man

shot up

The community.

In the years that followed,

Entertainment provided New

death. subdued but with difference. For the first time,

tenure, a venture that has continued to this day.

my Award is

Music.

To its reach. To iTunes and Amazon.

To gold men and compact women.

To A medal at dinner.

To armature engraved with gore.





if you nominate me for an oscar i will [REDACTED]



a film world home that is

The:

  • people who move.
  • art sent to age the world.
  • story cure for an outcast future.
  • rough ad love of cinema.






if you nominate me for a macarthur i will [REDACTED]



There are three criteria:

An individual who uses their wishes

to enable society.

A project equal

to the

human profession for profit

or limit to

honesti.

a citizen of the United States.






if you nominate me for a pulitzer i will [REDACTED]



Joseph Pulitzer richly endowed his

vision

of art—an America of

monetary power to rule

poetry, music, photography, memoir and audio as subjects adhering to the founder's will

the

Blood on the Field of Grammar

targeting play

criminally capturing land

Afraid of

a struggle with desire.






if you nominate me for a national book award i will [REDACTED]



MISSION

book cult


VALUES

  • Books are a cult
  • Books provide men discourse
  • Books are very here


VISION

  • Books are the nation
  • The Nation is books


HISTORY

literary history

iz the authors who have helped America.

Science Philosophy Religion History Arts

diffuse the impact of Poetry

so the Nation can

program “the world.”






if you nominate me for a booker i will [REDACTED]



Each year, English transforms

authors. not readers.






if you nominate me for a bafta i will [REDACTED]



you may be less familiar with

a fair and sustainable place

the very heart of art.

all people have the chance but industry and careers screen everyone to inspire

The storyteller cult and

Level the

creative experience for

People from all backgrounds.






if you nominate me for a nobel i will [REDACTED]



Alfred Nobel believed that people are capable of literature.

This left much to the establishment

and out of reach.






if you nominate me for anything i will [REDACTED]



This year, I wrote at least 100,000 words. How many more?

How many

is 100,000 words?

I last How?

This year, I ate words. many?

I wrote at least






and it will make you so sad you might just [REDACTED] too



i am writing this down

because your hands hold my life

as well as your own



save me please

save yourself too



so now you know

how to [REDACTED] me

(or yourself, if you want)




nominate

nominate

nominate









































exhortation

Determine what you want most in the world—your metric for success. Is it something given or bestowed, as an award or honor? If so, locate the official description of this symbol's mission or intent. Eviscerate it, by way of blackout or erasure poetry. If it is neither given nor bestowed, but rather shared tenuously between yourself and others—freely, equally—you may skip this exhortation, though you may yet gain some sliver of catharsis by carrying out the preceding with whatever you once—or might have, in another universe—craved.

































“critical analysis” was performed on December 28, 2023, as part of my ongoing performance series, performing mfa, in which I perform the work required to attain a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing, including playing the roles of my classmates and professors. Each performance concludes with an exhortation, which is a generative prompt that allows the audience to take part in the performance series—on their own terms, in their own spaces—if they so desire.
















Magazines and presses are presented alphabetically; inclusion on this list does not equal an endorsement. Whenever possible, I've linked to submission guidelines rather than submission portals. For the most part, those on this list either pay, offer very quick response times, offer free feedback regardless of acceptance, and/or accept previously published work. All accept simultaneous submissions unless noted. I'll fill this list out over time with as much information as I can. Sortable database coming soon. If you'd like assistance preparing your work for submission, please e-mail me at [Work AT RiveraErica DOT com].


A Public Space

Abode Press

AGNI

Alien Magazine

American Short Fiction

Analog Magazine

Anarchist Fictions

ANMLY

Apocalypse Party

Apparition Lit

Apple Valley Review

Arboreal Literary Magazine

Augur Magazine

beestung

Prose, poetry, fiction, nonfiction, hybrid, art, and translation by non-binary, genderqueer, and two-spirit writers and artists  Pays $20  Publishes quarterly, turn-around time can be quick  Submit via e-mail  Friendly team

Bennington Review

Blair

Bottlecap Features

Press for short, multi-genre chapbooks  Seems to publish often  Submit via e-mail  Sibling press of Bottlecap Press, which publishes chapbooks and full-lengths  Not currently accepting submissions from writers outside the U.S.

Briefly Zine

Brink

Broken Antler Magazine Quarterly

Canthius

Chismosa Literary

Conjunctions

Cult Magazine

Cursed Morsels

Cutbow Quarterly

Defunkt Magazine

Denver Quarterly

Eco Punk Lit

en*gendered

Archive for work about gendered embodiment  No payment  Publishes often, quick turn-around time  Submit via e-mail  Friendly team; sibling publication of Corporeal; same team as kith books

ergot.

Essay Press

Exposition Review

Fahmidan Journal

Prose and poetry, including flash fiction and flash nonfiction  Pays $25 via bank transfer and PayPal  Publishes quarterly, open for submissions year-round  Submit through Submittable  Offers paid feedback options; sibling publication of Fahmidan Publishing & Co. [LINK]

Feminist Press

fifth wheel press

Creative work by queer, trans, and gender-nonconforming people  Pays  Publishes often, some 24-hour windows announced on socials  Submit through Oleada  Also houses press for chapbooks, zines, etc.; has webstore to promote self-published works

Flash Frog

Foglifter

Fractured Literary

Fugitives & Futurists

Full House Literary

Funicular Magazine

Good Pointe

Horror and sci-fi stories for their Someone Just Like You audio fiction anthology through March 2024 Pays $75 via PayPal or Amazon gift cards  Submit through Google Form

Griffith Review

Gulf Coast

HyphenPunk Magazine

If There's Anyone Left

Indiana Review

Isele Magazine

JAKE

Prose and poetry, including flash fiction and nonfiction  No payment  Publishes super often (like, super often) Submit via Oleada  Super friendly team

Joyland

kith books

Press for trans, queer, Crip, Mad, straight, cis, and disabled authors Submit “pitches and submissions in all genres & art forms in all states of completion” via e-mail  Super friendly team; same team as en*gendered and Corporeal

khƍrĂ©Ć

Kweli Journal

Prose and poetry  Payment  Publishes four times a year  Submit via Submittable  Focus on BIPOC writers

Last Syllable

Little Puss Press

Madrona Books

Malarkey Books

manywor(l)ds

Leftist prose, poetry, art, hybrid, etc. (including previously published work) from trans, two-spirit, disabled, neurodivergent, Mad, queer, crip, nonbinary, genderqueer, and/or intersex people  Pays $10 via PayPal, Venmo, Interac e-transfer, or Wise; if no platform is suitable, they'll give your payment to a mutual aid fund or the like  Publishes quarterly  Submit via e-mail  Friendly team

Massachusetts Review

MEMEZINE

Metastellar

Michigan Quarterly Review

Minor Literature[s]

Mizna

Poetry and prose  Pays  Publishes several times per year  Submit through Mizna's online portal Has a pretty print version; Mizna also offers paid virtual Arabic language classes

n+1

new words {press}

Neon Hemlock

New Delta Review

Nightmare Magazine

Ninth Letter

NonBinary Review

One Story

ONLY POEMS

Poetry, including prose poetry and translations  Pays $55 per acceptance (as opposed to per poem)  Publishes often  Submit through Submittable  Accepts “uncurated” work (i.e., work previously published on social media or personal websites)

Open Minds Quarterly

Osmosis Press

Papeachu Press

Paranoid Tree

Passages North

Peatsmoke Journal

Persea Books

Ploughshares

Poet Lore

PRISM International

Prismatica Magazine

Prismatica Press

Prolit Magazine

Protean

Querencia Press

Radon Journal

Rattle

Poetry, translations, and book reviews  Pays $100 for work it publishes online, $200 for work it publishes in print  Publishes at least four times a year  Submit via Submittable  Has a lot of themed calls; adamant about accepting what it calls “uncurated” work (i.e., work previously published on social media or personal websites), which is fucking wonderful

Rescue Press

River Styx

Room

Rough Cut Press

SAND

Sans. PRESS

Seize the Press

Dark speculative fiction with an anticapitalist bent, as well as left-wing analyses of science fiction, fantasy, horror, or related pop culture topics Pays  Publishes several times per year  Submit via e-mail

SICK

Smokelong Quarterly

Sonder Lit

Sophon Lit

Southeast Review

Split/Lip Press

Split Lip Magazine

Poetry and prose, including fiction, flash, and memoir, as well as art  Pays $75 via PayPal ($50 for interviews/reviews, $25 for mini-reviews)  Publishes often  Submit via Submittable  Free submissions during January, March, May, August, September, and November; free submissions for Black writers always

Strange Horizons

StreetLit

Sundress Publications

Sweet Tooth

Tahoma Literary Review

The Baffler

The Baltimore Review

The Broadkill Review

The Drift

The Emerson Review

Fiction, nonfiction, poetry, and art  Payment TBD  Publishes once per year  Submit through Submittable  Friendly team

The Forge

The Future Fire

The Georgia Review

The Good Life Review

The Journal of Compressed Creative Arts

The Kenyon Review

The Maine Review

The Malahat Review

The Marrow

The Missouri Review

The Offing

The Rumpus

The Tales Between

The /tƐmz/ Review

The Worcester Review

theHythe

Tolka

Topograph

trampset

tRaum Books

TriQuarterly

Under the Sun

Creative nonfiction, ideally longer than 2 to 3 pages  Pays $50  Publishes once per year  Submit via e-mail or Submittable  Super friendly team; offers free, generous feedback from a large team of readers regardless of acceptance

Underblong

Variant Lit

Wasteland Review

Wigleaf

X-R-A-Y

Zero Readers

Fiction and nonfiction, poetry, craft articles  Pays, amount based on funds raised during submission period  Publishes at least once per year  Submit via online portal  Sibling publication of Pencilhouse, a wonderful service that offers free feedback on poetry and prose [LINK]

length: 1,000 words

content/trigger warnings: discussions of settler colonialism, medically transitioning, mental health, state violence, incarceration, and ableism, brief reference to apartheid






















Provide a Statement of Plans in which you explain your writing plans for the duration of the program. Statement may not exceed 1000 words.

What do you want? You want me to tell you the truth? That I plan to fuck your shit up? That I’m gonna mess with the minds of your little cohort ’til they’re unrecognizable—to you, to their owners? My plan is to enter your space like a Martian who’s learned to wear human skin, then begin the process of conversion. In what ways does this make me a missionary? In what ways am I a super secret colonizer, but colony as in microorganisms, blooming in the medium of culture, a process impossible to perceive until it’s too late? Is it still colonization if you’re an army of one? Is it still colonization if your target is the propagandist heart of the colonial cor(ps/e)?


150 words.


For the duration of the program, my plan is to strengthen my skill as a writer by exchanging ideas about craft and the political economy of publishing with my classmates. I’ve never been formally trained as a creative writer, and I’ve had very few opportunities to be part of a writing community, especially after publicly coming out as a transgender woman last year. Programs like these have historically lacked participants that are trans, of color, and Latinx/e, so my hope is to provide the institution, as well as my cohort, with a new and unique perspective on writing. Coming from a background in STEM, particularly technology and mathematics, I approach writing the way a mathematician might approach assembling a proof, or a technologist might come at a problem of engineering. Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Philosophy of Composition,” Teju Cole’s Tremor, and Kim ThĂșy’s em are key influences.


300 words.


I’m a fucking maniac—that, you’ve got to be aware of. I mean “maniac” as in Benjamin Labatut’s The MANIAC, about a man the jacket copy calls “a prodigy whose gifts terrified the people around him.” Literally, same. Not really, of course: “maniac” and “prodigy”—and even the idea of educational-privilege-as-“gift”—are silly colonial constructs, tied up with the histories of what I like to call perceptual incarceration (maintained as much with pharmacological restraints as with physical cage-and-straitjacket ones) and the socioeconomic apartheids we farcically refer to as “meritocracies.” The suffix -iac indicates a person afflicted with a certain disease, says one source; another defines it more simply as “of or connected with.” I am a person afflicted with a certain disease, that of or connected with man. I was born with a penis and assigned male at birth. Thankfully, I have my hands on the cure.


450 words.


By the end of the program, I hope to have completed my first novel, Artist, about two transgender best friends who switch places in order to dismantle a nefarious corporation. It’s a distillation of my interests in biology, physics, history, technology, mathematics, and art, with half of the novel written as a series of letters that explore critical ideas from each field. The other half describes the journey of main character Erica, who assumes the role of researcher at roommate Erick’s “culinary logistics” company, in what she believes will be a mission to blow the whistle on corporate malfeasance. What she uncovers instead is a species-defining scheme beyond the imagination of anyone but the most amoral capitalists. The novel grapples with the question of how artists put food on the table, and the problem of complicity in a world in which every settler is ultimately beholden to colonialism.


600 words.


What happens when you can forget that you’re trans? That you’re on stolen land? That your ability to breathe and drink and eat and think and love and mourn and write and cry is built on top of someone else’s grave? What would you do if I told you everything you know and suspect about the depravity in this world is true, and also barely scratching the surface? What if you knew—if you were certain—that very few have any idea just how bad it can possibly get? Will certainly get? That we will look back with something like fondness on today, when we finally become privy to the horrors of tomorrow? Some time ago, I looked over all I knew, and felt the abyss gaze back. In response, I wrote a poem. I’ve been trying to devise a method for disseminating its contents ever since.


750 words.


Another core part of my writing practice is engaging with communities of writers and artists. At the beginning of this year, I and my Art, Strike! co-editor built one that aligned with our values: that creative labor should always be paid at a living wage; that artists and writers should have total autonomy over the process of producing their work; and that the repressive hierarchy between creative workers and editorial gatekeepers needs to be abolished. Though ultimately modest—and eventually derailed by a paucity of funding—our efforts signaled to the publishing landscape that a reckoning is underway, that long-held norms which privilege the few are being challenged and rewritten with increasing aplomb. Art, Strike! is currently on an indefinite hiatus, one which we hope to soon return from; building ambitious, value-driven projects like it during my time in this program is another component of my writing plan.


900 fucking fucking words.


Sometimes I think of the process of transition as one of compression: I’m fitting an entirely novel person into a vessel previously home to another. If every space is an archive, then when I entered, I could still detect traces of the former inhabitant on every wall, in every corner—like an apartment out of which the last tenant hastily exited. I’m settling in, for better or worse; the body is inhabitable, for better or worse.

They say the brain is like a computer, only so much it can store.

I think they’re wrong.

I feel absolutely infinite.































exhortation

Pick a word count between 1 and 1,000. Write a series of short, connected pieces that each have that exact word count. Choose two radically different styles between which to alternate: for example, use plain, stilted speech in the even-numbered pieces, and extreme, hyperbolic language in the others. As you write, consider your multitudinous identities, and the differing ways in which they communicate. What does it mean to put them in conversation? How much time do you have before they collapse into each other, like atomic particles during nuclear fusion? What incalculable energy will be released when they do? What will you use it to fuel?
































“statement of plans” is part of my ongoing performance series, performing mfa, in which I perform the work required to attain a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing, including playing the roles of my classmates and professors. Each performance concludes with an exhortation, which is a generative prompt that allows the audience to take part in the performance series—on their own terms, in their own spaces—if they desire. The introduction to performing mfa is available to read on my website.


















length: 1,079 words

content/trigger warnings: discussions of capitalism, pandemics (COVID-19, mpox), and surveillance, references to war, climate change, displacement, psychosis, self-harm, and genocide



















Note: This performance series is currently on an indefinite hiatus.


























introduction

The pandemic, as we refer to it, is a misnomer, just as the great war was a misnomer even before we referred to it as World War I.

The pandemic is one pandemic of many that preceded it. It is one pandemic of many that it precedes.

As pandemics increase—have increased—in quantity and magnitude, so have and will other so-called global events: world wars, climate catastrophes, mass displacements, genocides. These are all, of course, interrelated and inextricable from one another, because every event is a global event, even if the atomization of academic disciplines keep the people who are supposed to make those determinations from drawing this conclusion so confidently.

Another form of atomization will accelerate simultaneously—the kind we euphemize with phrases like remote work, work from home, live-work space, low-residency program, hybrid participation, telehealth, teleconference, group chat, chat room, forum, Zoom call, FaceTime, metaverse, and virtual reality.

The next iteration we might refer to as no-residency. Maybe we'll take an old word and transform it: homework or lurk might indicate the labor of a future in which the office building is obsolete.

Your apartment or house will be owned piecemeal: by a landlord with dominion over kitchens and bathrooms and bedrooms, and a separate stakeholder who owns the room(s) in which labor is performed. New arrangements of power and resources will ensure you're in the space when expected, that you perform the labor as expected (doorframes as presence sensors, windows with cameras built into the glass, a desk that auto-logs keystrokes and mouse activity—who knows).

You might be connected to coworkers virtually, but with telecommunications infrastructures strained, most likely you'll work alone. More likely you'll replace your coworkers altogether, each individual required to function as a team: your employer will want proof you can adopt the perspectives of a diverse group of people, and demand that the interchange of ideas between them be made concrete, and so each day your Slack or Teams chat will just be you, talking to yourself, using six or ten or twelve personas, each of which will need to have a distinct personality and thus unique point of view on the work at hand.

It sounds lonely, or maybe disorienting, but voice changers and virtual avatars will help you keep track of who you are at any given moment. If you're really good at your job, you'll be a company of hundreds or thousands, all operating out of the same room, from within the same body.

Eventually, these norms will expand outwardly from the corporate sphere into the arts. I might argue it already has—that corporations will cop this schismatic self from a realm in which containing multitudes and improvising psychosis is already relatively commonplace.

Whether the chicken or egg came first is irrelevant.

All roads lead here.

performing mfa is an experiment, but above all else, a performance. For the next twelve months—on this piece of virtual land called “riveraerica.com,” tied to a piece of physical space in a city called “Los Angeles”—I will perform the work of an MFA in Creative Writing. I select a Hybrid concentration, which means I will study, write, and workshop pieces of poetry, fiction, and nonfiction, along with maybe some works that straddle genres, in the spirit of the experiment as a whole.

Winter is application season, so in November and December, I will perform the process of applying to these programs, as well as that of applying for the scholarships and aid that would allow me to pay my way through, though technically I will determine the program's cost and can tell you now that I will receive full funding to attend.

In January, I'll accept myself into this program of my own design. I'll skip the part where I'd wait seven months for it to start, so soon after, I will settle into a virtual classroom of about ten or twenty students, each one played by me.

Over the months that follow, I'll perform the act of reading books and poems and short stories and essays; I'll perform the work of the workshop, reading and critiquing the writing of “others,” as well as my own; I'll perform the act of attending office hours to discuss my progress, asking faculty for advice on pre- and post-graduate life; I'll even perform the labor of building community with people in my program and institution, which are comprised wholly and solely of me. We'll build organizations, host readings, found literary journals, form cliques and private writing groups, protest complicities, go on spring and summer breaks, and have our hearts bent and broken by the weight of institutional demands.

By our and we'll, I mean my and I'll.

I am uncertain about the efficacy of performance-as-prefiguration, whether the process of embodying a speculative fiction can help prepare someone for its realization, or even allow the performer(s) to actively manifest it. Whether it can provide helpful tools for use when the future comes to town. This may be because to anticipate something is to miss that it's already happening, already happened. That the performer is actively absent from reality because they have been consumed by the performance. If, prior to the pandemic, someone had considered something like depression or anxiety a communicable disease and acted accordingly, they would have been more prepared for the pandemic than if they had simply play-acted what they would do once the pandemic did occur. They and their fellow performers would have established real care networks for real conditions already affecting them, rather than scheduling the care for a later date. This is probably the difference between networks of mutual aid and so-called theater of the oppressed.

Then again, even the work people undertook after the pandemic unfolded didn't necessarily prepare, for example, LGBTQ+ communities for the spread of mpox (except for maybe the increased ubiquity of Personal Protective Equipment, and the marginal destigmatization of terms like incubation period, viral load, and quarantine).

If this project is worthy of undertaking, it's because performing something offers the performer a small bit of emotional distance that experiencing something can't. That slight distance, lived under the guise of a performance, may somehow turn out to be useful.

Maybe if I subject myself to a trauma I design, and make that subjection public, someone—maybe me—will come to know something.

Maybe this is just a roundabout route to self-harm.

Maybe this is the heart of performance/art itself.

—Erica Rivera, November 10, 2023






inspirations

_improvisation scares some musicians, i think, because how can they possibly know what to play next if they don't have the sheet music dictating, sitting right in front of them? improvisation isn't about knowing what to play next. it's about being so in sync with the people and world and music around, there's only one note you can possibly play next. it's not about making it up as you go, it's about being so clairvoyant the next note comes to you as though a vision.

when a musician makes a mistake in the process of improvisation, who can really tell? well, the musician, of course, and their fellow musicians, and if you listen closely, you can tell too, because your body will react before your words do, and if we can love our bodies enough to hear their pains and their pleasures, we can notice the mistakes we inevitably make, and then hear ourselves play different and better notes, bringing the band back together into some kind of harmony._

— “orbicular,” Erica Rivera

Embedded YouTube player for Folding Ideas's video essay titled “I Can't Stop Watching Contagion,” in which the creator, an older white man with glasses, lies dead-eyed on a plaid couch while projected onto him are clips from the film Contagion and news footage about the pandemic; his voiceover explains that, since the dawn of the pandemic, he has been unable to do much other than watch and rewatch the film Contagion, as an attempt to emotionally inoculate himself to an uncertain future, particularly the narrativeless or unpoetic aspects of pandemics that deny easy meaning-making or closure, which he argues that the film Contagion captures well through its hyperrealistic presentation of mass death and social deterioration

— “I Can't Stop Watching Contagion,” Folding Ideas
LAUREN: THE HUMAN INTELLIGENT SMART HOME

LAUREN is a human intelligent smart home. Lauren will visit your home, deploy a series of smart devices, and watch over you remotely 24/7. Lauren will control your home for you, attempting to be better than an AI, understanding you as a person. You will be able to interact with her by calling her na


— “LAUREN,” Lauren Lee McCarthy
> @philipglassmusic > > 1.26.24 Philip Glass Solo Philip Glass performs beloved works for piano, from his home studio and personal piano, on an intimate new record coming January 26, 2024. Pre-order link in bio > > ♬ original sound – Philip Glass

— “1.26.24 Philip Glass performs beloved works for piano...,” Philip Glass
LM Brimmer's PDF Teaching Guide for Gabrielle Civil's “the dĂ©jĂ  vu”

PDF download, 272 kilobytes

Guide_thedejavucivil.pdf

272 KB

— the dĂ©jĂ  vu: black dreams and black time, Gabrielle Civil

The early history of prefigurative politics, extending back to at least the Russian soviets of the early twentieth century or even the Paris Commune of 1871, was firmly grounded in counter-institutions that sought to bring existing social and economic institutions under popular control or create new institutions to supplant existing undemocratic institutions. This meant democratically managed factories, schools, health clinics, and living spaces. Later, with the New Left, prefigurative politics came to incorporate an emphasis on developing a “beloved community” among movement participants. This was based on the idea that transforming social relations was a necessary precondition for broader structural transformation. Wini Breines argues that the novelty of the New Left was precisely its attempt to accomplish both of these goals simultaneously. But as she describes it, tensions emerged between these two elements and it became a primary fault line that ultimately undid organizations like Students for a Democratic Society. Since then, much contemporary prefigurative politics has focused on perfecting democratic processes within movements, moving even further away from counter-institution. In part because of this shift, advocates of prefigurative politics from the New Left to Occupy have been subject to the critique that such a politics is incapable of achieving larger structural transformation. It is seen as excessively focused on internal relationships among participants, and as such ineffective at both outward-facing movement-building and executing a broader strategy to transform existing institutions.

— “Prefiguration or Actualization? Radical Democracy and Counter-Institution in the Occupy Movement,” Daniel Murray
> So, before BHQFU stops meaning “THE SHIT PILE BEFORE US” and starts meaning “someone else will fix it,” let’s take down the sign. BHQFU is dead. There’s no space, no classes, no faculty, no students, no staff, no president, no plan. All that remains is a problem. It’s my problem, Bruce’s problem, and it’s yours if you want it.

— “Broken Toilet: BHQFU is Dead,” Seth Cameron









performances

I'll keep a running list of links to the performances on this page below, and later, duplicated at the top.

performing mfa

Creative nonfiction, essay  Introduction to performing mfa  Performed November 10, 2023  Available to read on my website

statement of plans

Creative nonfiction, essay Application supplement Performed November 14, 2023  Available to read at Osmosis Press

critical analysis

Series of 16 poems  Application supplement  Performed December 28, 2023  Available to read on my website

optional scholarship application

Mixed media, series of three images with image descriptions  Financial aid request  Performed December 31, 2023

congratulations!

Creative nonfiction, essay  Acceptance letter  To be performed















length: 4,682 words

content/trigger warnings: discussions of genocide, transphobia, poverty, segregation, settler colonialism, white supremacy, murder (lynching), Islamophobia, anti-Palestinian racism, anti-Kurdism, homelessness, substance use, mental health, misogyny, suicidal ideation, police/state violence, illness (cancer), death, and grief




















Early in the year, someone I know and care about tells me there’s a genocide being waged against trans people.

I almost burst out laughing.

Driving between Los Feliz and downtown L.A., I trade glances between the road and my phone as I type. If there’s a genocide on in America, I write, it’s against unhoused folks, substance users, people struggling with their mental health.

The person on the other end—quite literally on the opposite side of the world—tells me that U.S. politicians are explicitly calling for the murder and imprisonment of trans people.

I reply, glibly:

They’ve been saying that about poor people forever.

I say something to the effect of:

This whole thing is being blown way out of proportion.

The person on the other end challenges my misunderstanding, but I won’t be convinced. How do you argue with someone in denial about the truth?

Generous, they relent. They remind me that the most marginalized unhoused folks (substance users, etc.) are trans, anyways. This I can swallow, and we move on.

Later, I’ll apologize for being so wrong.

Later, I’ll remember what it is to be a target.





*





At my alma mater, I am one of about twenty students enrolled in a student-led class that most people refer to as “the Palestine class.” Its official title includes a direct reference to settler colonialism. On the first day of class, our student-teacher is calmer than I would ever be in his position, explaining that the university is suspending the course for all sorts of made-up reasons. We don’t actually learn anything about Palestine that day, or maybe we learn the most important thing there is to know about it.

Over the next few weeks, we’ll organize, as a class. We flyer campus. We plan a protest. I think at one point my job was to rent a U-Haul and bring twenty desks from the community college a city over because we’re going to place them in one of the university’s most public spaces, and sit in them with tape over our mouths. We intend to stay there until we’re dragged away, or the class is reinstated.

We use that word a lot during this period: reinstatement. We all just want the course to be reinstated, we find ourselves saying, as though wanting anything more would be too much. We all just want to learn (though it goes far beyond that for many of us, particularly the student-teacher).

When the head of the faculty senate comes to class one day, she says our course is the first in the university’s history to become an international incident. She’s referring to the fact that an Israeli foreign minister was interviewed in Israel about us. On live TV, he assured the journalist interviewing him that the problem was being taken care of. He insisted it would be an egregious act of antisemitism for the university to permit the course to continue. He declared that the Israeli government had reached out to the university to make this clear, which someone employed by the university eventually confirms for us.

Some people call this “cultural genocide.”

It is genocide all the same.

After the class is reinstated, the location of the class changes. This is in case we become a target. During class, I often look out the long row of windows on the northern wall for signs of something ill-intentioned. I have done this more or less in every classroom I’ve been in since eleventh grade, when I first began to fear being the target of a mass shooting.

Today, I have a folder I always keep near me with printouts of the most valuable readings I was assigned during my time in academia. Almost every reading from the Palestine class is in the folder.

I learn more about how the world works in that class than in any other. To understand Palestine is to understand everything. To understand genocide is to understand everything.





*





A year or so after the Palestine class, I take a class on Kurdish, the language. It is filed on my transcript under Near Eastern Studies. There are no more than ten students in the class.

We learn the language, Kurdish, but also about Kurdish culture. We get to know the founder of Chobani, Hamdi Ulukaya. We celebrate Newroz, the Kurdish New Year. We watch Min Düt, a Kurdish film about two children and a baby whose parents are assassinated by what I think are supposed to be Turkish mercenaries. The kids spend the back half of the film homeless and broke. At one point, they come face-to-face with their parents’ murderer and are forced to consider killing him. “Min düt” is Kurdish for “I saw.”

My professor is a good one: devoted, committed. He pours himself into us. Since the class is mixed, so that some students have experience with the language and others don’t, I and another total beginner get private lessons outside class to catch us up in the professor’s office. Our professor is not paid more to offer this extra class time. Sometimes the other beginner isn’t available so it’s just me.

I try really hard at first, but my interest in education is dwindling. I have the increasing sense that I am going to kill myself, and somewhere deep in the back of my head, I worry I am probably trans. These are excuses, of course. I am always aware of the gravity of our lessons, and my failure to adequately honor them.

In addition to Kurdish, the professor teaches Turkish. It is a far more popular language option, and also the language of his people’s oppressors. In Turkey, it is a risk, sometimes a lethal one, to speak Kurdish—to teach it, to celebrate Kurdish culture, its holidays. Our professor is told by the university that he cannot teach Kurdish unless he teaches Turkish too. In at least one way, this class is an outlet for him. Late in the semester, I apply for a grant with him to publish a formal textbook based on the excellent informal one he’s built up over the years. I am severely underqualified for this and we do not get the grant.

By the end of the semester, I can barely speak or understand the language. I was better at it midway through, when all the objects in my room are labeled with Kurdish words and their genders on little white stickers. Most of them fall off or become worn, unreadable.

I feel relief when the class is over, the relief of leaving a foreign country of which you do not speak the language. There is no longer the anxiety of being put on the spot, of being asked questions multiple times without being able to answer, of seeing the look of disappointment on my kind professor’s face.

Years later, but long before I come out to him as trans, my biological father spots my coursework in a storage bin. I tell him about the class. Impressed, he asks me to speak a little. I stumble, then say “my name is” in Kurdish, and my deadname in English. It’s all I have. He looks disappointed too. I speak Spanish fluently, and a decent amount of French. I am good and capable with three very colonial languages. I wouldn’t be able to tell you what “my name is” in Kurdish is now unless I looked it up.

This is also genocide.





*





My stepfather dies and I consider his life and death a product of genocide. There’s a meme that goes something like, “Every queer and trans person who kills themselves is a victim of genocide.” My stepfather killed himself, slowly. He sat at a desk for decades on end in order to receive a hefty pension, which he does, right before he dies.

A few years before that, he starts to refer to himself as Black. He is.

Afro-Latinx/e, some would say. Indigenous may be more accurate.

There is more I wish I could say about this, but I do not have the right. Besides, I have not yet finished grieving.

Don’t know if I ever will.





*





A few days ago, I participate in #DVPit. This is what people in the publishing industry call a pitch event. The “DV” in #DVPit stands for “diverse voices.” The event is intended to rectify inequities in publishing: like #PitBlack and #LatinxPit, it’s limited to marginalized authors whose books might otherwise be lost in the massive slush piles literary agents spend much of their time sifting through.

Right before the pitching event begins, someone in the “introduce-yourself” channel mentions that they’re concerned about pitching a book about Palestine. I don’t know whether the author is Palestinian. We’re told to use hashtags like #POC (People of Color), #BVM (Black Voices Matter), #NIV (Native Indigenous Voices), #ND (Neurodiverse), and #TV (Trans Voices) in our pitches to make our identities clear. For whatever reason, the author in question only uses #Palestine in their pitches. I think it’s fair to assume they are Palestinian, though in a world that has recognized the vacuity of #OwnVoices, if not yet pitch events, who the hell knows.

I have the sense no one really knows how to respond to their comment; it is never clear whether or not a space is safe until its facilitators make it clear. Even then, safety is always in question: an ongoing process, a constant negotiation. The rules of the server say hate speech and discrimination of any kind will not be tolerated. For people like me, this is a sign that a space is completely unsafe.

On Discord, you react to comments by selecting emojis (“reactions”), which people can then click so that a little counter beside the emoji increases, or they can select their own emoji as a reaction. I hold down the author’s comment and select the “hug” emoji. Over the next hour or so, a few more people click the reaction. Seven in total, eventually, including mine.

Nobody, including me, comments or replies. Later, a lively discussion about Jewish representation in literature will unfold in the “watercooler” channel. “I care about all children who suffer no matter who they are,” is what the person who starts the discussion says.





*





I was old enough to understand the aftermath of September 11, 2001, as it happened. My stepfather is deployed to Kuwait. We tie a yellow ribbon around the tree in the front yard. We go to a military base and get letter-writing kits along with the other military wives and their children. Everyone is obsessed with being good Americans. I am ten years old.

By the time I am twice that age, I have read the infamous “little Eichmanns” tirade and I know enough to know that he is right. It is not cold or glib to say this, though for a long time it is only ever in private that I admit I agree. Like everyone else, I mourn death selectively.

The Pentagon is a few miles from my elementary school. After one of the planes hits it, I watch smoke rise from the rubble against an otherwise clear blue sky. I will spend the rest of my life expecting this to happen again. I conclude that it is only a matter of time. Instead, for the next twenty years, I watch on the news as it happens everywhere else, all of the time, with increasing intensity. Most pundits explain these developments with the equivalent of “stop hitting yourself.” It’s what settlers have told colonized people for centuries.

Patriarchy breaks men; cisheterosexism destroys cis/straight people; white supremacy drives white people to kill themselves (and worse). Just the same, settler colonialism always ultimately kills settlers, too.

It is only, ever, a matter of time.





*





“I got my start writing essays, op-eds, and long-form journalism, in which data and reporting could add up to tidy conclusions,” reads my artist’s statement for the 2024 Tin House Winter Workshop. “Now, older, I have more doubt—less faith in what I have to say.”

Echoing a poem I once wrote and then deleted, I write: “To my father, a former musician, I once described my position in life as that of a pianist who grew to view the keyboard as a colonial instrument, my task to work with others to dismantle and reinvent it.”

I continue by credentialing myself: “This year, I founded an online publication called Art, Strike!. We paid our collaborators (rather than contributors) what they asked for: up to 100% of a shared, replenishing fund-pool. Almost everyone asked for 100%. After three reading periods, including one open only to trans writers and artists, I ran out of money and we went on hiatus.”

Finally, the meat of the statement, what many call “the why.”

“My work, like Art, Strike!, is fleeting, provocative, and deeply concerned. I am deeply concerned by the norms in the publishing industry, and the trauma it generates in my fellow creatives. My background in STEM gives me insight into the future here: spoiler alert, it’s not pretty. Another word for concerned is afraid. I write fiction because I may doubt my own ideas, but I have more faith than ever in the ambiguity fiction demands.”

I close with a touch of melodrama: “In mathematics, a derivative defines the rate of change of a function; it is information about information, one degree removed from the data provided. To get the original function, one takes, intuitively, the antiderivative. Yet every function has infinite antiderivatives; some information always gets lost in the process of derivation. My fiction is the derivative of what I have to say; my readers, by reading, take the antiderivative.”

I say “fiction” in that last sentence, but what I really mean is all my writing. If I wanted to tell a reader how I really felt, I’d get to know them first. There’s no point in being yourself around someone you don’t trust.

I should probably clarify something: it’s not that I think silence will protect me. For God’s sake, I hardly pass. I am, as they say, “visibly trans.” In other words, I can be dead silent and still pose a threat from a mile away. I can make myself small, conceal myself like a hermit crab burrowing back into its precious shell, and I can still be stepped on and broken in two with ease. All someone has to do is want to. Our world encourages people to want to. Tells them it’s okay. Morally necessary. Desirable, even.

This is one underdiscussed aspect of genocide: pleasure. When people are slaughtered en masse, their murders aren’t cold. They are carried out with glee. For those doing the killing, it is a joy. Your death will bring them happiness, ecstasy. Look at photographs of the audiences at lynchings and you’ll know what I mean. Humans can’t do something so unnatural on so large a scale unless they’re given permission to smile through it.





*





ghettos are the refugee camps for the subjects of colonisation and neocolonisation: they are internal neocolonies. gentrification is the planned replacement of a population by another: it’s not just about rent; gentrification *is* genocide

This is what someone I know and care about says online. They are right.

I show this quote to someone else I know and care about, whom I live with in an ethnic enclave inside of another ethnic enclave in the city of Los Angeles. It eloquently summarizes what we bitch about more brusquely every time we step outside our apartment. Even our dog displays all the trademark signs of PTSD.

Part of the stress the person I live with endures is about me. Every day, my gender presentation becomes more and more feminine. Every day, I become more and more of a target. On top of everything else, the rental agreement does not permit me to live in the apartment with them, so I often have to leave and spend time wandering the city in order to avoid being seen by the landlord, or worse, the building owner.

I protect myself as much as I can. I stop wearing makeup. I stop wearing skirts. I stop using my favorite purse (pink, blue, and white, the colors of the trans flag). I stop shaving. I paint my nails a neutral peach-pink instead of ruby red or matcha green. I spend most of my time in West Hollywood (“gay mecca”), where the discrimination I’ll face will be related to my economic stratum rather than my gender identity.

The life expectancy for trans women of color is, I hear recently, 35.

This is partly why I go to the Social Services office this week—to get on food stamps, so we can eat healthier and not rely on the unpredictable junk the food bank offers. It’s partly why, the day before, I go to a free clinic specializing in trans care—not only for hormones, but also to get my health in order.

Three years is not enough time to do all things that I need to do. I continue to assume each morning, as I have since starting my transition, that I will be dead by the end of the day.

At both the Social Services office and the free clinic, while I wait, I stare at my phone. I use a private, nameless Twitter account to look for paid writing opportunities. Mostly my feed this week is about Palestine. Writers and their representatives post wildly, desperately about it—sometimes in anguish, sometimes indignant. It reminds me of 2020, and 2017, and 2014: “why is no one talking about this” is a common refrain. Another is some formulation of “Silence = Death,” at least as old as HIV. The call is to speak up and speak out; to bear witness; to use our writerly voices.

There’s a letter circulating titled “WRITERS IN SOLIDARITY WITH PALESTINE” and I’ll probably sign it. It asks signees to commit to engage with BDS—the vanilla one, as someone I know and care about calls it, where the D stands for divest rather than destroy. It asks signees to decline professional invitations to and funding from Israel, which the letter puts in quotation marks (I’ve always felt preceding the name of settler colonial states with “so-called” communicates the sentiment better). The sixth and final ask is for signees to boycott Zionist literary institutions and publications.

Okay. I’m not really sure who on the list of signees was gunning to work with PEN America or Harper’s or whatever “Best American Poetry” is (“American poetry” sounds, to me, like an oxymoron). I’d hoped the letter would go a little further: pull a Sally Rooney, ask signees to refuse to have their works translated into Hebrew, or published in (so-called) Israel.

Or something much further than that.

Another commitment in the letter is to openly discuss the occupation in your workplace, at home, on social media, in your work. I don’t have a social media presence so that’s out. I’m unemployed so that’s out too. At home, we watch videos about the genocide and cry, as we’ve done with every genocide that’s played out live online in front of us since we met, including our own.

In my work—well, that’s this essay.

I consider posting a link to the letter in the #DVPit Discord; in another world, it would be the ideal place to post it. The server is supposedly packed with marginalized people, but I know better than to trust people just because this world has made them targets. More often than not, that only makes them look for easier targets—to scapegoat, to use as human shields.

Plus, if I’m going to post it there, I’d like this essay to be available to read beforehand. I may end up having some difficult conversations with strangers. I want to be able to point them to this so that, as much as is possible, they know exactly who they’re talking to.





*





Long before the Palestine class, long before the one in Kurdish, I attend community college. I enroll in Political Theory, the class I’ve been looking forward to taking more than any other since deciding to go back to school. The professor is an old white man, who redeems himself by defining political theory extremely broadly: the first text we read is the EnĆ«ma EliĆĄ, and he makes a convincing case for religious mythology and speculative fiction being integral to the process of politics.

Later in the semester, we read Eichmann in Jerusalem, which spawns heated discussions on the subject of complicity. I am steadfast in my belief that everyone is complicit when genocide occurs, except maybe children and/or others incapable of consent.

Our professor doesn’t seem to disagree, I think, but argues for the sake of pedagogy. “I fought in the Vietnam War,” he tells us, “not by choice, but because I was drafted. When I got back, I protested like everyone else. Does that make me complicit?” He’s looking at me as he talks. There’s something in his eyes that makes me wonder if he is not just arguing for the sake of pedagogy. I don’t remember if this is the case, but it feels like I’m alone on one side of the classroom as the discussion unfolds.

“Of course,” I reply, “everyone was. It happened. You allowed it to happen. You were unable to stop it. That makes you complicit. That doesn’t have to be so scary. It can be true, and you can still do the work of confronting it. We’re all complicit in something right now.” (This is about a decade ago, when I say the right things but still don’t understand their meaning.)

In his office, at the end of the semester, we discuss the future of politics. He’s as pessimistic as I am, but also holds out hope like I do. We both separately arrive at the same conclusion: the next great work of political theory will be a work of science fiction, of literature.

That work probably sits somewhere unread in a slush pile. Maybe a printout in a folder or a storage bin. Its writer, perhaps, has moved onto more important things. Nobody has much need for whatever we refer to as politics, let alone political theory, anymore. Nobody has much need for whatever we call writing either. This doesn’t have to be so scary. It can be true, and we can still do the difficult work of confronting it.

We’re all complicit in something right now.





*





Before this essay ends, please know: I don’t say everything that’s on my mind. I honestly don’t know how anyone does.

But then I know exactly how. Known is the natural condition of the human in a surveillance state. As someone I know and care about always says: in the future, we will all want 15 seconds of privacy.

I’ve left more than enough here and there for anyone like me to understand what I believe. There’s no reason for me to say any more than what I’ve already said. Besides, speaking in public—writing for an audience—is one of the least interesting things a person can do.

Why do you think I’m a writer?

Why, do you think I’m a writer?





*





There is a very small chance that the building owner or landlord may enter our apartment today, so I leave early and plan to stay out until at least the afternoon. No big deal; I need to finish this essay anyways. It’s been a while since I’ve written something this long or important to me so I consider it just as important to pick the right place to settle in and finish it.

I drive first to the Griffith Observatory; from there, I’ll be able to see the whole of the refugee camp that is Los Angeles. But I miss the entrance to the parking lot and am slingshotted by traffic cones and park police back down the slope towards the bottom. I consider it a sign. There’s no point in reflecting on the city from that high a vantage point; it makes everything look deceptively docile. Also, there is a painful memory I have of my stepfather that Griffith Park makes me think of, when he visited and wanted to see Dodger Stadium from that high up and I drove us there and refrained from telling him the story of the little genocide that made the stadium possible.

Instead, I drive back towards downtown—to Central Library, where I’ll have Wi-Fi and a quiet space in which to write. On my way there, I pass through Los Feliz, the same stretch of street on which I once tried to deny the genocide of people like myself.

Central Library is a microcosm of Los Angeles: it has a beautiful Octavia Lab, named after the sci-fi author I have to work not to worship, and filled with expensive equipment intended to both spark creativity and facilitate commerce. Outside the lab, it is mostly swarms of police officers and security personnel. A large contingent of patrons use the library as a resting place. Every once in a while, one of them makes just enough noise for the cops to feel like they have something to do.

On its social media accounts, the library celebrates the fact that everyone is welcome, including unhoused folks. I don’t know about that. I hardly feel welcome, and all I ever do here is read and type. In the bathroom, right before leaving, I am verbally harassed for my gender presentation for the first time. It’s an ugly rite of passage that, as many trans people will understand, is infuriatingly gender-affirming.

In an exhibit tucked away in a corner of the library that I’ve never seen anyone else in, there are photographs and videos that tell the story of how someone set fire to the library—twice—and how it was rebuilt from the ashes. A short story in the book I pitch during #DVPit is loosely based on this. I don’t make this connection until I move to L.A., and realize that the real fire must have influenced the fictional one, in my story.

To be honest, I don’t really like that I came here. I don’t really like this part of this essay. I don’t like the idea that my actions were influenced by my writing, even though I often feel the stories I write are warnings from myself to myself—parables of sorts, letting me in on the wisdom my subconscious has to offer—and that I would do well to allow my actions to be influenced by them. I suppose what I don’t like is the idea that my actions have been determined by something I haven’t written yet, that I come to the library in order to finish this essay in a place that is symbolic enough to merit inclusion in it.

In my opinion, actions should not follow from writing. Writing, if it happens, should follow from actions. When writing is worth reading, it’s the residue of actions worth doing.

I don’t know what Art, Strike! will become; we’ve been offered space on a cooperatively-owned platform called Comradery, something like a cross between Patreon and Kickstarter. In two weeks, I am scheduled for an onboarding call with two of their members to see if we are a good fit for the site. If all goes well, we’ll begin raising money so we can return from our months-long hiatus.

When I first devise Art, Strike!, I describe it using two definitions: strike, as in to walk out and stop working, and strike, as in to collide with other art.

There’s another definition of the word that I like: a synonym for the verb “ignite,” as in the phrase “strike a match.”

If anything ever happens to the people I know and care about, I don’t know what I will do.

I do know you can only light yourself on fire once.



















length: 6 circles

content/trigger warnings: depiction of neocolonialism



















Venn diagram titled "NEOCOLONIAL DATA CAPITAL EXTRACTION MODEL", the largest circle labeled "EVERYTHING". Bottom-right quarter of this circle has several overlapping circles, the largest labeled "WHAT GETS RESEARCHED BY ACADEMIA". Slightly smaller circle overlapping it at bottom-left is labeled "WHAT GETS MONETIZED BY CAPITALISTS". A similarly sized circle overlapping the two previous is labeled "PRODUCTS/SERVICES/KNOWLEDGE FOR THE RICH AND POWERFUL". Completely inside this circle and overlapping the two before it is a smaller oval labeled "DATA PRODUCED BY THE SUBALTERN AND SOCIALLY TRANSGRESSIVE". A dot inside this circle as well as all the previous ones has an arrow pointing to it labeled "THIS DIAGRAM". The smallest circle is labeled "THE SUBALTERN/SOCIALLY TRANSGRESSIVE" and overlaps all the previous ones, save for a sliver at right that remains outside all but the outermost circle. A dot inside this circle as well as all the previous ones has an arrow pointing to it labeled "ME". A dot inside this circle's extruding sliver has an arrow pointing to it, its label redacted, scratched out in black.

Venn diagram titled “NEOCOLONIAL DATA CAPITAL EXTRACTION MODEL”, the largest circle labeled “EVERYTHING”. Bottom-right quarter of this circle has several overlapping circles, the largest labeled “WHAT GETS RESEARCHED BY ACADEMIA”. Slightly smaller circle overlapping it at bottom-left is labeled “WHAT GETS MONETIZED BY CAPITALISTS”. A similarly sized circle overlapping the two previous is labeled “PRODUCTS/SERVICES/KNOWLEDGE FOR THE RICH AND POWERFUL”. Completely inside this circle and overlapping the two before it is a smaller oval labeled “DATA PRODUCED BY THE SUBALTERN AND SOCIALLY TRANSGRESSIVE”. A dot inside this circle as well as all the previous ones has an arrow pointing to it labeled “THIS DIAGRAM”. The smallest circle is labeled “THE SUBALTERN/SOCIALLY TRANSGRESSIVE” and overlaps all the previous ones, save for a sliver at right that remains outside all but the outermost circle. A dot inside this circle as well as all the previous ones has an arrow pointing to it labeled “ME”. A dot inside this circle's extruding sliver has an arrow pointing to it, its label redacted, scratched out in black.


















length: 505 words

content/trigger warning: discussion of death, grief


I.

“For now, let's just take it in parts,” the narrator says. I don't know who you think your characters are speaking to, but you should know that they're speaking to you.

If artificial intelligence problematizes creative writing, it's because the magic of reading is your awareness of the person on the other side of the page. On the page. No one really idolizes a character or a story; they are mesmerized by someone's ability to believe. This is why a cake will always taste better than a chair, and why no one will ever put their life on the line for a car.

I am always trying to say something. I am always trying to tell myself something. If I do it with care, you'll be told something, too.

II.

You have to know grief. It feels, when you feel it, like the opposite of hope, i.e., a vacuum, and humans need oxygen to breathe, so it's understandable why one would rather avoid it. But there are balms quite literally everywhere, on every corner. More common on a corner than in a home. More abundant in the middle of nowhere than at the center of everything.

Not everyone grieves. Some people live and die and never know grief, nor its balms. You have to know that sometimes this is worse. Maybe always.

The artist's name was Karen, by the way. The one who left the country. The one whose children died. The one who worked a farm, then wrote a book. The one who never said goodbye. The one who returned to say hello.

III.

A dog and a cat navigate a narrow alley. “It's too tight,” the dog says. “I don't think I can pass.” The cat replies, “Just go like this,” and stretches out until it's skinny enough to wiggle through. The dog, much larger, does the same but gets stuck. “I'm no good at being a cat,” the dog laments. “No,” the cat replies, “it's just that some cats are good at being right here.”

IV.

I'm still here.

V.

“You have this with something,” the footnote starts. A short story is the transcription of a dream you dream while you're asleep. As tangible and accurate as a dream can be. A novel takes that dream and turns it into a building. At some point someone's going to want to live in it, and now you've become a landlord. “Take the scariest, most vulnerable parts of yourself,” the footnote continues, “and turn them into a class. Review its syllabus. Enroll in it and attend. Try to take its final.”

Don't be fooled; nothing is anything else.

But everything is right beside everything else, and someday that will be something worth rooting for.

length: 638 words

content/trigger warning: references to sex, death, murder, birth, urine, grief, trauma


again. There's always more to say.

Length

I don't have much time: a thousand words, maybe, maybe a few thousand, maybe even only a few hundred. Monologues are boring.

Character

Get into two headspaces: two characters (two people, a person and an animal, a person and a feeling or a memory or a concept, two concepts, two animals, whatever). Give us one's perspective explicitly, and the other's implicitly. Both characters must be at least equally interesting, especially to you. You don't ever have to mention one of them; you can even edit them out of the story completely. But know that they're there.

I am never alone.

Plot

I am the most interesting person in the world, but I have the least interesting things to say about myself. I have had the most interesting experiences in the world, but I have the least interesting things to say about them. Write what you know, but get outside it. I see myself from outside myself only when I write. If I saw myself from outside myself at any other time, I'd die, instantly.

Something has happened to me. Not grief, not sorrow, not rage, not pain, not trauma; not a break up or an engagement or an illness or a gift or a promotion or a move. I live. A heist is not a plot. Neither is a funeral, nor a birth. Nor a murder. Nor sex. Nor love. I am constrained by the same things as everyone else: life, time, the world's turn. 

Think about what's just beyond you. Perceive something that isn't there. Remember a memory that isn't yours. Eat a meal and pretend it's something else. Sleep and dream a dream you haven't dreamt. Piss in a room you'll never be in. Care for someone you'll never know. That's your plot. Maybe you're pissing in a coffin or caring for someone giving birth; maybe you're eating a meal during a heist or remembering a murder. Maybe there's sex right beside you; maybe even love. But these things are incidental.

I only know how to be alive, and that's far more than enough.

Themes

You have something to say. But all you have is an untuned piano, or a modest drum. Trust the instrument. There's a rhythm. There's vibration. Maybe lyrics, but mostly just the same words repeated as chorus. That's all you need.

All I ever want is to feel, and that is what I trust the most.

Editing

Just stop writing. It doesn't matter. Now forget you wrote what you wrote. Destroy it if you have to. Then pretend the person you love most wrote it. Adjust until you're ready to give it back to them. Then pretend the person you hate most wrote it. Adjust until you're ready to give it back to them. Then give it to everyone you know and care about, and trust what they say, but know that it's up to you whether and how much you care.

I keep moving in order to live; I don't know any other way to survive. All swarms eventually become islands, which always eventually become swarms again.

Publishing

Print it out and leave it somewhere you'll never go again. Or post it on a website no one will ever have the link to. Leave it there as long as you can; ignore it as long as you can; then go and look at it, whenever you want to (seconds later, minutes later, days, weeks, doesn't matter). Is it exactly what you wanted? Is it perfect? Adjust if needed. Start again.

I am always ready to start again. I will always be ready to start again. I start again, and again, and

length: 1,155 words

content/trigger warning: references to abuse, depression, sex toys, bodily fluids (urine, semen), drugs (psychiatric medication, amphetamines)


There's a lot I want to say but of course there's only so much that I can. So much that I should. They say that should's a bad word but sometimes it's protection. A defense. Art is war most of the time, probably always, but only because life is. War isn't the best word here. There's another word I should use but the time isn't right yet. Sometimes I think this is knowledge hoarding but it's not like I made up the word. It's not a word nobody knows. The word's out there, the concept's out there, all you'd have to do is apply it to this: art, writing, storytelling. The definition of art is recontextualization, you know? I don't know that that's step one but it's definitely oneof the steps. Maybe the only step. That seems reductive, but the definition of art is also reduction, you know? Recontextualization is reduction, but also expansion, so let's say the definition of art is contradiction too. Ooh, now we're getting somewhere. Or you could say, “now we're cooking,” and so the definition of art is also — well, I've probably said too much already.

Another idiom: “There's nothing new under the sun.” I don't know if that makes you feel bad but I know for me it's relief. It's just us. There's nothing but us. So of course there's nothing new. We're all there is, and we don't change too quickly, or at least not quickly enough to make new possible all that often. We also change extremely quickly (contradiction), so there's always something new (recontextualization), it just won't be recognized as new until it's old (reduction). You know?

Okay, by way of example: my best friend tells me I'm a good writer and that I gotta do something about that and a hundred years ago Arturo told me it's okay not to be a writer and I took his word for it and he wasn't wrong but he wasn't right either. It's okay not to be a writer but it's not okay not to dream. Imagine. Create. And if you stifle that impulse long enough all you get is nightmares instead. A year into the pandemic, I wanted to apply to a bunch of startup incubators and get a fuck ton of seed money to build, I don't know, Theranos for dogs. Lyft for trikes. One Medical for bees. Amazon for dildos. AirBnb for blue jeans. I don't know. Honestly, I was actually pretty good at it, but only because anyone would be. You're broke and you fall for a pyramid scheme and you'd come up with just about everything I did. VR for aliens. AI for sluts. Netflix for amphetamines. Juicero for cum. Or maybe piss. Whatever.

Anyways, my best friend is right so I start writing. Once upon a time, I was so depressed and so heavily loaded up with psychiatric medication, I couldn't write without using AI: I'd feed a line to GPT-2 (an oldie but a goodie) and it'd feed me something back and then I'd go from there. Most of what I wrote with it was okay. It was fine. 

So I thought about doing that again but then I looked out the window. 

I didn't see a park but there was a park down the street. Then I went to the bathroom and there was a book called The Hologram across from the toilet, between the toilet paper and the Q-tips. So I started writing a short story called “The Hologram” about someone who looks out a window and sees a park with a hologram at its center.

That's it. 

That's all.

Take everything you see seriously. Mash together whatever's around you. Then work until you're done. 

You can do it because it's what you already do every day except for someone else. Now do it for the reader. I was going to do it for a startup incubator. Now I do it for the reader.

Okay, but there's something missing, and I don't want to talk too much about the why, only the how. Just know that I hate bylines. (Bylines are fame is power is abuse; reduction, whatever, you understand.)

I came up with a system: a byline made up of two names, the names of people who already exist (real or fictional, it doesn't matter), and written with no spaces and all lowercase. Kind of like usernames. One of my short stories, “The Hologram,” is by georgewallace and londonbreed and it doesn't really matter whether you know who they are, you understand. Triangulation works because three data points determine a fourth; two intersecting lines don't really have a “center” unless you connect them by a third. The two names are the two lines; the title of the story is the third. Their center is the story.

More simply: if George Wallace and London Breed wrote a short story called “The Hologram,” what would it say? 

That's it; that's all.

Some examples:

“RIOT!” by jonathanlarson and pussyriot

“The Everything Girl” by ziwe and elizabethholmes

“The People vs. John F. Kennedy-North” by dorothyparker and northwest

“Cronenburg” by davidcronenberg and brandoncronenberg

“Ru Girl” by asiaohara and thevixen

“Please Don't Read This If You're White” by shaunking and racheldolezal

“Sim City” by willwright and janejacobs

“The Prompt” by chatgpt and dalle

“250 BPM” by janefonda and daftpunk

“6°” by kevinbacon and rolandemmerich

“Major War” by jillbiden and vladimirputin

“Station Twelve” by mirandacarroll and dondawest

“Station Thirteen” by frankchaudhary and idabwells

“Station Fourteen” by paulimurray and antoninartaud

I have another 30 or so of these somewhere, most I never wrote. Some I did. Some I wrote half, or more. “Platformer” [LINK] was originally by fĂ©lixguattari and gillesdeleuze. “The Girls from Pasadena” was originally by — well, that one's self-explanatory.

Feel free, by the way, to write any of the stories above; they're prompts of sorts, I suppose. But, of course, you'll have better luck if you come up with them yourself.

There's a lot I want to say — to get you where you need to go (the end of a short story) — but still I fear I shouldn't. So if the definition of art is also transgression, then I should do something that I shouldn't (contradiction), so I'll tell you, finally, to think of this art as the art of mathematics. To write a story like you'd craft a proof. To tell a tale like you'd fashion an equation.

There's always an answer at the end. A solution. Resolve.

That's it. That's all. You understand. You understanding.